Vampire Buffalo Square Dance

Whatever Pops Into My Head. (Want It To Make Sense? Get Your Own Damn Blog.)

If You Can't Have What You Want...Want What You Have
[info]pinko_75228
I was fiddling around with a draft on this subject, and not very satisfied with how it was going, when I ran across this article in Christian Science Monitor.  Since I can't say it better than the author does (damnit!) I'm just posting her article.  Read it.  (No...really...read it.)

Want less, spend less – wealth is relative to desire

It's when we are satisfied with what we have, that we become rich.

By Diane Cameron

from the December 3, 2008 edition

Guilderland, N.Y. - We are concerned about the economy. We worry about the stock market, investments, and retirement. We hesitate to open bank statements. We are told: It will get better. It will get worse. It will rebound.

How do we cope? We have to make do with less. Lots of articles offer advice: Eat at home. Take the bus. Rearrange, don't redecorate.

At the heart are these questions: What can you live without? Can we be happy with less? Can we do it when the American way seems to be distilled lately to all about believing that we need and deserve more?

What I keep thinking about is what it was like when I really did have less.

In my 20s I lived in Washington, D.C., and made $13,000. I had an apartment and a car. I packed my lunch and saved up to go out for dinner. Was I really as happy as I remember? Yes. Most of us probably were. The reason isn't complicated.

We wanted less.

I was proud to be paying rent. I wanted to drive instead of take the bus so making the car payment for my used 1971 VW Beetle was great. I bought clothes on sale or at consignment stores, and when friends moved they passed along furniture they didn't want.

But over time, through reading and traveling and meeting people, I learned about nicer cars and better clothes. I bought into the status symbol they stood for. I began to want a real couch and a newer car and I began to fantasize about someday buying a house. Later my hopes included owning a Subaru and – I laugh to remember this – I thought I'd have the perfect wardrobe when I could buy one (yeah, one) really good purse.

Today, four houses later and many closets filled with shoes and purses, I can feel deprived simply by thinking about making my car last a couple more years. Everything I have now is nicer than what I had at 25, but it's easy to feel poor. Why? Because I have seen – and imagined – better.

Wealth is relative to desire.

Every time we yearn for something we can't afford, we become poor – regardless of our resources. It's when we are satisfied with what we have, that we become rich. The hard part is understanding that and adjusting accordingly.

We know there are nicer things and we see people who have them. For this you can blame television and magazines.

Through them, we can see easily what others buy and own and wear. Every new thing whispers its promise of happiness then gradually slides into the background of everyday life. Then we notice that someone else has a different or nicer thing. And we suddenly need it, too. This isn't the same as ambition or reaching for a goal; it's more about tweaking how we think about what we want.

This is why many of us recall feeling better when we were younger. We felt as if we had enough because we hadn't yet begun to compare ourselves with others. We didn't expect that we should have a lot more. It's our expectations that trip us up. We substitute one material desire for another, convinced each time that the next whatever will make us happy. And we then seek out that happiness through spending money.

But what we need is less desire, not more money. There are two ways to make a man richer, writer-philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau reasoned: Give him more money or curb his desires.

The solution this year: Expect less and want less. Perhaps the way to sort a real desire from just wanting is to wait a few weeks and see if the want changes. Or maybe to listen carefully to the dialogue inside. Is the inner voice saying "I like this" ... or "They will be impressed"?



Squirrels and Bats
[info]pinko_75228
Another black day.  Hounds baying on the moor.  Monsters stalking in the dampening fog.  Huddled by the sputtering peat fire, clutching my cloak around my shivering shoulders.

Here's a head-scratcher for you.  File it under "Moral Ambiguity In Localized Suburban Multivariate Ecosystems"...or "Mother Nature's A Heartless Bitch".  Man in Vienna, Virginia, having seen a hawk that had taken up residence in a tree on his property catch and kill squirrels before, observed this same hawk  "eyeing" (his word) a baby squirrel in an adjacent tree.  Said concerned citizen and avowed "animal lover" fetched his trusty 12 guage and killed the hawk.   He was arrested by the local constabulary, charged, and convicted of "discharging a firearm inside city limits", of which he was clearly guilty, and "cruelty to animals".  He pleaded "not guilty" to the charge of "cruelty to animals", though, because killing the hawk saved the life of the baby squirrel.  Was he right?  Was the life of the squirrel more valuable than the life of the hawk?  Would it make any difference if the hawk had fledglings of her own to feed?  Are hawks "cruel" because they're predators?  Are squirrels worth saving because they're "cute"?  Was the guy guilty of "cruelty to animals"?  And who gets to decide?  (Well...in this particular case a judge got to decide.  But that's just the legal answer.  What's the moral answer?)

And because I don't feel like making the separate entry that the subject really deserves right now...D.C. Comics announced today that another icon in the turgid undercurrent of adolescent fantasy, Batwoman, is gay...joining Albus Dumbledore in the small, but growing, pantheon of queer superheroes.  (We've all known about Batman and Robin for years and years, haven't we?  C'mon now...we have...haven't we?) 

    


Bus Buzz
[info]pinko_75228
O.K.  So I do actually feel a little better today.  A little.

Bus Notes
(Or, Why Do Fat Women In Flip Flops Universally Choose Public Transportation?)

The "Bus Doze".  A curious phenomenon.  One you don't really notice at first.  When you (and of course when I say "you", I mean "me") first start riding the bus you're unaccustomed to commuting in a group.  What are the rules?  1) Why are drivers invariably laconic and surly?  2) Can I ask that guy to move his bowling ball bag so I can sit down?  3) Does that guy know he's talking to himself or does he think he's talking to someone the rest of us can't see?  4) If I accidentally hit the "stop requested" signal too soon do I have to get off too soon?   5) Am I somehow obliged to engage in conversation with somebody just because they're in a feloniously perky mood?  6) Is that guy picking his teeth with a switchblade??  All issues which consume one's initial probationary period as a public transportation commuter and guarantee a sort of anxious wakefullness.  But after that introductory period you begin to notice that complete consciousness doesn't seem to be a requirement of bus ridership.  In the morning (granted, I catch a pretty early bus from my joint to work) you'll see riders, both men and women, get on...pay their fares...find a seat...lower their heads and close their eyes...and almost immediately appear to nod off.  Same thing in the evening on the way home. It's interesting to watch when you first notice it.  For some time I really expected to eventualy see someone snap suddenly to consciousness, rub their eyes, look around wildly and jump up shouting "Sonofabitch!!  I missed my stop!!", to what I could only assume would be great comic effect for us, his co-commuters.  Never happens.  And then...the "bus doze" begins to overtake you.  If you let your eyes lose focus, your head droop a bit, and your breathing slow down you'll find it possible to enter a not at all unpleasant state somewhere between consciousness and sleep.  You'll still be marginally aware of your surroundings (which accounts for the whole not-missing-your-stop phenomenon) but resting more or less comfortably.  At least more comfortably than your previous state of low-level anxiety afforded.

By the way...the answers to the questions above are:  1) it's a crappy job,  2) yes,  3) the second thing,  4) no  5)  no...you're allowed to stab unbearably perky passengers, especially on the morning run, and 6) probably.  


(no subject)
[info]pinko_75228
Difficult month, January.  Some more so than others.  Mine was particularly crappy this year.  I try to keep the truly crappy parts, as opposed to the minor annoyances, out of the blog.  That's not the purpose I had in mind for it.  I save the real problems for the paper journal...or just scream into my pillow and kick the dog (my fair mountain bride's, not mine).  Still haven't worked out the best way to handle that, but Saturday at my grandson's 6th birthday party his dad reminded me that I haven't posted in some time and gently chided me for ignoring him and the two or three others who read this blog.  And he's right, of course.  Responsibility is responsibility...even if it's self-imposed and nobody really gives a crap.

And, on the somewhat brighter (if weirder) side, my dear friend Hyman Finklestein (no, of course that's not his real name but remember, I don't use real names in the blog unless I have permission, and those of you who know him will recognize him anyway), after complaining bitterly that accessing and manouvering the blog was far too much trouble, finally condescended to read a page or two in the thing, which made me unaccountably, if briefly, quite happy.

I wasn't sure when I started this whether or not I was going to decide to "spill my guts" (a particularly distasteful metaphor, ain't it?).  But now I think...no.  Doesn't do any good.  And I'm not a girl...no matter what you've heard...so I don't have to "express my fe-e-e-e-l-l-l-ings" to all and sundry in order to feel validated...or whatever it is girls get out of the experience of hoarding up every single errant thought that flits across their frontal cortex so they can sh-a-a-r-r-e them with their cadres of BFFs.

Maybe February will be better.  God, I hope so.

The Bus Stop Jig
[info]pinko_75228
What a morning.    Since I had a little "extra" time I took longer than usual to shave, shower, and generally prettify myself this morning.  Just enough "extra" time for me to miss my bus, I noticed, as I leisurely checked the time while putting on my coat and scarf.

Crap.

Temperature hovering around freezing, I trudged (the only form of locomotion I can manage at oh-dark-thirty) up to the bus stop and stood, or actually hopped up and down on alternate feet to generate a little warmth, for a couple of minutes before I absentmindedly put my freezing hands in the pockets of my coat and realized I didn't have my bus pass.

Crap.

I damnsure wasn't going to pay three bucks for a day pass when I had a perfectly good annual pass back home in the pocket of my other coat.  So I turned away from the bus stop and started back down the block, just in time to hear, over my shoulder, the next bus sail by.

Crap.

I shuffled (a rate of locomotion slightly faster than a "trudge") back down the block, struggled with my difficult front door lock, let myself in, surprising the heck out of my wet, glistening, and altogether au naturel bride fresh out of the shower, managed not to get distracted by my wet, glistening and altogether au naturel bride, congratulated myself for not getting distracted by my wet, glistening and altogether au naturel bride, realized that I had let myself get distracted by congratulating myself for not getting distracted, refocused on my bus pass, retrieved same and scurried (a further escalation in pedestrian motility) back towards the bus stop just in time to observe, from half-way down the block, the next bus pass by.

Crap.

Finally got to work...snarky, mumbling, and out-of-sorts.  So...no change there.  Forgot my lunch.

Crap.  


Happiness Is A Warm Gun
[info]pinko_75228
One of the Masonic organizations to which I belong is having a Valentine's Day raffle (with proceeds going to charity, of course).  The prize for the winner is a matched pair of Glock 9mm's.  Apparently nothing says "I love you" like a semi-automatic handgun.  (I swear I'm not making this up...but I confess I am reporting it just to see if I can hear Tex squeal all the way from Nova Scotia.  I'm betting, yes. )

Careful! Don't Step In The Predictions!
[info]pinko_75228
I ordinarily have at least a modicum of respect for "The History Channel".  They produce some really good stuff.  "Modern Marvels", "The Universe", "Ancient Discoveries", "Cities of the Underworld" and others are intelligent (or at least not stupid) and interesting.

Then, of course there's "UFO Hunters" and "Monster Quest" but hey...they gotta pay the bills somehow I guess.

Still...on average...pretty good stuff.  Doesn't make you bang yourself in the forehead with the remote repeatedly like several other choices you could have made.

And yet, and yet...the channel execs have recently succumbed to the current, and recurring, popular fascination with that curious old itinerant physician and occult obscurantist...drum roll please...Michel de Nostradamus.  Dear God, why can't pulp hacks let the poor old twitch rest in peace?  A couple of dozen books about and around Nostradamus are published each month.  You see them on supermarket wire racks, book store remainder bins and, ultimately, strip mall used book shops.  The consuming passion of the sort of people with too much time and too little to do is to "interpret" what Nostradamus meant when he penned his quatrains.  The "answers" range from unlikely to preposterous.  For example:

During the appearance of The Bearded Star
Struck by fire from the skies,
Mabus will soon die,
Then will come a horrible slaughter
of people and animals
At once vengeance revealed coming
from a hundred hands.
Thirst and famine when the comet shall pass.

The above quatrain means that Willie Nelson will light a joint from a tree limb which falls when lightening ignites it while he's caring for his sick dog Mabus and then go on a rampage, killing all kinds of people and animals, after which he'll become thirsty and hungry while scrubbing his bathtub.

Not buying that?  Why not?  O.K., I made that one up, but it's no goofier than the most recent popular "interpretation" of the same quatrain:
  
The comet/planet Nibiru will return to Earth on it's 36,000 year orbit around the Sun and cause horrific natural disasters in it's passing.

Not buying that either?  Enough people are to warrant the publication of a book titled Nostradamus 2012.  Oh yeah..."2012" because that's when the world will come to an end according to occult "interpretations" of the Mayan calendar.  Still not buying it?  Jeez, you guys are a hard sell!

The truth is, as usual, much more prozaic than returning planets and apocolyptic scenarios.  The truth is...nobody knows what the goofy old scribe had in mind when he penned his lines.  The most reasonable explanation I've heard is that his writings are a scathing observation of, and commentary on, the political forces at work in 16th century Europe.  Nostradamus traveled widely in his career as a physician and healer and, being court doc to more than one European court, had opportunities to observe the statecraft of the day that most other men didn't.  He was forced, according to this theory, to write his commentary in a sort of code.   Perhaps he intended to reveal the code to someone someday...perhaps he intended it as a "memory aide" for himself and to write a plain text version himself at some future point, when the political climate made it safer to do so.  Who knows?

And that's the point.  Nobody knows.  What's fairly certain, however, is that there is way too much wood pulp wasted by sensationalist writers who claim to have the correct interpretation of Nostradamus's "predictions".

Headbanging
[info]pinko_75228

Head-Banging Bad for the Brain

Bianca Nogrady, ABC Science Online
 
 
 
 
Mind the Brain
Mind the Brain | Discovery News Video
 

Dec. 18, 2008 -- Led Zeppelin's immortal song 'Dazed and Confused' might well have been a clinical observation on the state of their audience's brains, say Australian researchers who have found over-enthusiastic head-banging can cause mild brain injury.
In a study published in the British Medical Journal this week, two University of New South Wales (UNSW) researchers concluded that head-banging to a typical heavy metal tempo could cause mild traumatic brain injury or concussion, and neck injury, particularly as the tempo of the music and angle of movement increased.
"Clearly it's a serious issue," said Associate Professor Andrew McIntosh, co-author and professor of biomechanics at UNSW.
"If you observe people after concerts they clearly look dazed, confused and incoherent, so something must be going on and we wanted to look into it."
After careful observation of the behavior of heavy metal concert-goers, McIntosh and honors student Declan Patton constructed a theoretical head-banging model to better understand the mechanics of the practice.


Yoo-hoo...me down here.  I'm wondering for whom this information could come as news?  I told Brian David for years that headbanging was a hazard to one's mental health.  Of course at the time I just meant that I thought it made kids stupid...not actually brain-damaged.  That would explain a lot, though.  I think Professor McIntosh may be either kidding us, or revealing more naievete than he realizes, when he observes that young people after concerts "look dazed, confused, and incoherent, so something must be going on..."  Hm-m-m.  Wonder what that "something" could possibly be?  I think the Professor spends too much time in his lab.  That...or he doesn't have teenagers.


Meetings
[info]pinko_75228
Everybody claims to hate 'em...especially the suits who obsessively "invite" each other to them.

"We should meet on that."
"Were you at the meeting?"
"When's the meeting?"
"Omigawd...I'm late for the meeting"
"You on the way to the meeting?"
"Weren't you invited to the meeting?"
"Haven't we already met on that?"


Four or six or twelve twitchy, anxious people sit around a table, their shoulders hunched over their  Franklin-Covey Planners, gripping styrofoam cups of rancid coffee and brushing stale doughnut crumbs off their power ties and their DKNY no-nonsense-but-I'm-not-trying-to-look-like-a-dyke blouse trying desperately to sound like they know what they're talking about and praying, praying, that whoever called this damn meeting won't even notice I'm here if I shrink down really really low and pleasegod puhleeezegod don't let the boss call on me for a heuristic analysis of my last quarterly projection of classified versus professional overhead costs, minus mandated federal ADA inputs cause I made the whole thing up cause I have no idea what any of that crap means which is probably O.K. cause neither does he omidearsweetsufferingjesus how long is this damn meeting going to last anyway?

Maybe I'm wrong.  Maybe meetings are useful.  We should probably have a meeting on that.   

What Engineers Do When They Retire
[info]pinko_75228
Shared with me by my ol' pardner Therona...and thence I with you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AxG1kM4HOlU


You are viewing [info]pinko_75228's journal